Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by gitpusher on Friday June 16, 2017 @05:53PM
(#14572915)
I also read Paris, and thought "stars" referred to celebrities. Oops
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by return0 on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:16PM
(#14573026)
Me too, and i think we discovered a new phenomenon.
OK i ll rationalize it, stars aren't "Born" , humans are. "A star is born" is a common phrase, and doesn't usually refer to stellar objects. Since i was tricked to believe it was talking about humans, it;s easier to understand how i might have confused pairs for Paris (which was also capitalized). Plus i dont wear my glasses.
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by hanoz on Friday June 16, 2017 @07:42PM
(#14573380)
Good analysis. I was disgusted at myself for taking the Parisian celebrity interpretation, then somewhat consoled but at the same time disturbed that on Hacker News of all places so many people did the very same. But I think you've hit the nail on the head with the title-case Pairs factor. The All Stars expression probably introduced some anchoring too.
Exercise to the reader - use the observed principals to concoct an equally misinterpretable headline.
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by aeleos on Friday June 16, 2017 @05:57PM
(#14572937)
That is literally the exact thing that I thought too. Its interesting that a sentence like this can be so easily misinterpreted by multiple people in the same way.
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by ryanar on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:18PM
(#14573044)
The brain has multiple indicators for this misinterpretation. Stars early on in this sentence, narrows down context, Born in makes us even further think of a human star aka celeb, Pairs is capitlized, making us think it is a proper noun, the brain also doesnt read the middle letters of words if you remember that word jumbled experiment where you can still read it. All of this combines together to make the brain on first glance say Paris and not pairs
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by janwillemb on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:41PM
(#14573127)
Isn't it the capitalization of the first characters of each word which causes the confusion?
New evidence that all stars are born in pairs
versus
New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
I've never understood the rationale of capitalizing headlines this way anyway (is it the American way?)
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by obmelvin on Friday June 16, 2017 @08:34PM
(#14573591)
Yes, titles of things (including but not limited to visual art, written works, songs) are generally all capitalized except for small words
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by burke on Friday June 16, 2017 @08:35PM
(#14573602)
I also read it as Paris, but correctly interpreted "stars" as celestial. It was a very confusing two seconds.
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by pix64 on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:24PM
(#14573067)
"All Stars"
Re:New Evidence That All Stars Are Born in Pairs
by sxates on Friday June 16, 2017 @06:00PM
(#14572951)
Yes, me too.