News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The bold "pay-what-you-want" restaurant experiment by Jun8 on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @05:00PM (#1456314)
"Radiohead makes most of its income by touring, so even if they lose money on the album, but get more popular, they can just go on tour. A restaurant has no other way to get that money back."

This is the crucial point. The Radiohead model is not applicable because for them the albums is a publicity machine that feeds into their real business: concerts, memorabilia, etc. Think Google, every free service/tool/platform they offer funnels into their main search business.

I think for big chain restaurants, like Panera, this may make sense. The loss they suffer from 2-3 stores is more than offset by the huge publicity they gain, but they cannot do it widely. For small unknowns it doesn't make sense to do it continuously but they make try it for short periods of time. Similar to how small businesses tolerate Groupon's huge 50% commission.

Doing this as a short (e.g. 2-3 month) experiment also gives you an excellent indicator of the perceived value of your service.

Re:The bold "pay-what-you-want" restaurant experiment by bradleyland on Wednesday June 23, 2010 @10:47PM (#1457167)
It's also worth examining the cost of the goods being sold. The "cost" of a digital album download is negligible. The cost of producing a meal represents a significant portion of the selling price when you factor in labor.