Right[1]. Nobody makes risky[2], ethically challenged[3] decisions[4] in business[5]. Ever[6]. Doesn't happen[7].
[1] https://www.recode.net/2017/5/11/15628924/alphabet-waymo-law...
[2] https://www.yahoo.com/news/hampton-creek-serves-another-vega...
[3] http://fortune.com/2016/07/08/rise-fall-elizabeth-holmes-the...
[4] https://www.inc.com/business-insider/inside-lending-club-sca...
[5] http://fortune.com/2016/08/14/fraud-allegations-hud-skully/
[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/01/technology/a-silicon-vall...
[7] http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-us-attorney-could-look-at...
I'm with you on the skepticism, but they are one of the largest companies in the world because of ad revenue. It's not putting their business at risk, it is their business.
Whether they record ambient audio or not, how is it implausible or out of character with everything else they do? Facebook and many other companies collect countless dimensions of data on users to profile them for marketing. Audio is just one more. It's not even really that disturbing or far fetched. Why would they ignore such a lucrative data source when they've already tapped so many others?
It's a direct business plan with Amazon's echo for christ sake. What is so hard to comprehend about this?
There are many reasons why such things happen: coincidence, someone google the topic from the same router IP address, ad tracking on Googled websites, etc etc
The idea that one of the worlds largest companies would risk their entire business by secretly recording their users for ad revenue is absurd on almost every level.
Yet some people on HackerNew, a forum that self-selects to a highly educated/intelligent part of the community actually believes it.
It's mind-boggling.