News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The blockchain paradox: Why DLTs may do little to transfo... by jerguismi on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @03:30PM (#14555366)
Why would you want to do that with a blockchain? Is it necessary to store this logging data to thousands of nodes? What about 5 servers, geographically distributed?
Re:The blockchain paradox: Why DLTs may do little to transfo... by subway on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @03:54PM (#14555574)
Why do you assume a blockchain has to consist of thousands of nodes? A private blockchain works equally well across those 5 geographically distributed nodes.
Re:The blockchain paradox: Why DLTs may do little to transfo... by scient on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @04:20PM (#14555792)
So why use blockchain? Whats the benefit? The only thing I can think of is proof of authentication attempts, a kind of a irrefutable log of some sort. But whats the benefit its providing, that we are lacking today?
Re:The blockchain paradox: Why DLTs may do little to transfo... by subway on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @05:57PM (#14556429)
That irrefutable log is highly valuable in environments where there is a need to audit who has requested access to what resources, and when.
Re:The blockchain paradox: Why DLTs may do little to transfo... by BaronSamedi on Thursday June 15, 2017 @09:02AM (#14559965)
I think this is a really good idea. Would it be worthwhile to have a neutral party also maintain a node? Would that give the evidence more weight in court for example?
Re:The blockchain paradox: Why DLTs may do little to transfo... by girvo on Thursday June 15, 2017 @09:31AM (#14560163)
While I am not allowed to talk too much about it, this is exactly what I'm currently working on for certain high profile companies that wish to share information (query results) between themselves, without ever actually sharing the data itself, in a way that the country-wide regulator can verify and check for anticompetitive behaviour.

I'm currently having fun experimenting with homomorphic encryption, to see if I can't add another layer of "trustlessness"