Re:Homo naledi was chipping its teeth amazingly often
by jdmichal on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @04:27PM
(#14555853)
The lines make it easier for the eye to track from one point to the next of the same series.
They also make it easy to visually compare different wear patterns for different species, especially as the teeth are sorted back-to-front. For instance, on the mandible chart, the lines make it very easy to see that the teal, red, and blue lines have similar patterns.
Re:Homo naledi was chipping its teeth amazingly often
by pjvandehaar on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @03:47PM
(#14555501)
I agree that a stacked bar graph would be nice, since the focus is on the per-species total across all 8 tooth types.
Could you explain why a line graph is bad for a discrete but ordered variable, like [Molars - Premolars - Canines - Incisors]?
Re:Homo naledi was chipping its teeth amazingly often
by benchaney on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @10:21PM
(#14557493)
In this case a line graph is bad because the line doesn't mean anything. It implies an extrapolation that doesn't actually exist.
[dead]
Re:Homo naledi was chipping its teeth amazingly often
by soared on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @02:48PM
(#14554998)
Stacked bar graph
Re:Homo naledi was chipping its teeth amazingly often
by gghhvgx on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @02:58PM
(#14555113)
Harder to read
Choice ultimately down to personal preference.
Re:Homo naledi was chipping its teeth amazingly often
by fwefwwfe on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @03:34PM
(#14555397)
6 different overlapping lines like that make it easier to read? It's amazing what people chalk up to personal preference.
None of those graphs should be line graphs. There is no continuous X variable.