I wonder if they worry about their Climate Change denial impacting their credibility in other areas. If they'll happily take money from fossil fuel interests to try to undermine the scienctific community, who won't they attack for pay?

There are many defensible arguments against government programs from across the social and political spectrums, but they don't come from the Heritage Foundation. They have a severe beyond reason bias against government.

Do you think Institute for New Economic Thinking, a think thank founded by George Soros, is any less biased?