Re:Apple Pay and the rise of the five-party network
by saurik on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @09:57PM
(#14557411)
As both a consumer and a merchant I really like this world where even small transactions are insured as it means that everyone--including me--can just mostly trust everyone and not have to have some complex passcode or multi-factor security setup to access and spend money. I like that I just have a card in my wallet that I can nigh unto flash at people and be handed a hotdog, and yet if someone steals my wallet or tries to hold me at gunpoint there is never any reason to not just hand them my card.
Re:Apple Pay and the rise of the five-party network
by aianus on Thursday June 15, 2017 @08:42AM
(#14559817)
You like it because the costs are hidden from you. I bet you'd think twice about using your card to pay for your hotdog (or even something like a MacBook) if they explicitly passed the fees onto you and you could opt out with cash.
There's room for both systems for different kinds of transactions with different kinds of merchants.
Re:Apple Pay and the rise of the five-party network
by diogenescynic on Thursday June 15, 2017 @08:02PM
(#14565511)
As a merchant, they would pay those fees--so no, the costs are not hidden for them. Did you miss that part?
Re:Apple Pay and the rise of the five-party network
by samfisher83 on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @10:16AM
(#14552865)
You don't think some startup will not take fees? Who is paying for infrastructure and salaries?
Re:Apple Pay and the rise of the five-party network
by aianus on Wednesday June 14, 2017 @04:46PM
(#14555995)
The fees can be a lot lower when you don't have to maintain rewards programs, liability for fraud, or dispute mechanisms.
Bitcoin is ridiculously inefficient compared to what a centralized entity could be and it's already cheaper than wire transfers or even credit card transactions over a certain size.
Insurance is for health and houses not my $8 lunch or $500 wallet contents.