Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by jonknee on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @04:55PM
(#14548567)
How is that in any way related to gender? I also "marginalized" Tumblr and Summly, was that me throwing shade towards men?
Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by pessimizer on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @07:44PM
(#14549644)
They didn't make money.
Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by jonknee on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @08:06PM
(#14549768)
Yahoo doesn't break out the numbers so we don't know how much revenue any of the companies they acquired are bringing in (profit would be even more difficult because of shared resources). Regardless, none of this has anything to do with gender. I chose a large, medium and small example from a list of Yahoo's acquisitions.
Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by thesagan on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @07:58PM
(#14549729)
He asked how is that related to gender?
Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by weirdstuff on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @06:30PM
(#14549225)
So, if someone posits that a business venture is frivolous, actual profitability aside, that is anti-female (or anti-male) statement/view?
I still don't understand. Can you please elaborate?
Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by pessimizer on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @07:44PM
(#14549643)
If someone posits that a profitable business venture is frivolous, it's not about whether it's good business or not. Also, you do understand.
Re:Verizon closes $4.5B acquisition of Yahoo, Marissa Mayer ...
by weirdstuff on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @07:49PM
(#14549679)
Back to the point: what does any of that have to do with sex or gender? Maybe you will elaborate, if OP won't.
In specifically marginalizing a profitable business acquisition just because he'd assumed it was frivolous by its' nature.