News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by brianwawok on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:08PM (#14547100)
Tulips have SOME intrinsic value. If doomsday comes, the world is over.. a toolip can be planted outside your house and it looks a little bit more pretty. Or maybe you can eat it.

Gold has SOME intrinsic value. It is very good for certain applications, I believe trace amounts are used in compute parts. Worst case you can make something shiny to look at, that will be rust proof and easy to shape.

What is the intrinsic value of ETH or Bitcoin? It literally has nothing to back it.

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by jerf on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:33PM (#14547334)
"Tulips have SOME intrinsic value. If doomsday comes, the world is over.. a toolip can be planted outside your house and it looks a little bit more pretty. Or maybe you can eat it."

That's an argument that they don't have intrinsic value, but only value contingent on their ability to look pretty or eat them, both things which themselves will depend on where you are on the Maslow hierarchy and your needs for food vs. decoration.

Same for your argument about gold.

Intrinsic value is not contingent on your needs, and, well, this is why it does not exist and there isn't anything that has intrinsic value and indeed the very concept is incoherent when you try to nail it down. Nothing has intrinsic value; it is all relative to some entity's desires or needs.

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by njarboe on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @03:18PM (#14547743)
People want to have something as "a formal token of delayed reciprocal altruism (Richard Dawkins)" and these tokens have probably existed as long as language (~100k years) first starting as shells of a specific size and species. The first DDG hit of this phrase[1] brings up an essay that looks interesting, although I have not had time to read it yet. Gold and silver (and credit based on them) have been that token for most societies since around 600BC. Fiat currencies have been used but flame out spectacularly. I don't think one has lasted more than 100 years. Private gold was made illegal in the US in 1933 and the dollar debased. State exchanges of gold and currency at a fixed rate ended in 1971 with the dollar going full fiat. People are looking for the new token.

[1] http://nakamotoinstitute.org/reciprocal-altruism-in-the-theo...

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by komaromy on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:15PM (#14547167)
For ETH, that's not really true: you can use it to pay for computation on the Ethereum blockchain. The value you assign to that computation may not be very significant, but it's hard to justify the notion that it's zero.
Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by avaer on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:20PM (#14547217)
I'd argue the value of the computation is strictly less than zero, because I could do it cheaper without using Ethereum at all.
Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by wayn3 on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:30PM (#14547309)
thats like saying that the value of gasoline is less than zero because you could just walk the distance without polluting the environment.

computing power is inherently valuable. the value of AWS is less than zero because you could just buy a computer and do the computation cheaper at home. duh.

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by avaer on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @03:59PM (#14548083)
The value of the trickle of gasoline to get me to my kitchen is less than zero. To use it I would have to waste considerable money architecting a way to get my car indoors.

The value of AWS is greater than zero because spending my day monitoring my server would be exponentially more costly than paying Amazon to do it at scale.

And Ether is worth less than zero (as a computation engine) because I could develop and run the computation in less time by opening vim, even if the Ether was free.

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by AstralStorm on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @03:44PM (#14547952)
Not if you factor in support costs you wouldn't. (Or sunk equipment costs for small scales.)

Gasoline allows one to use large amounts of power at the same time, say, to run a generator, start a power plant or run power tools for construction.

Bitcoin is not useful in and of itself as the current system of transactions is perfectly workable.

On the other hand, try running power tools on solar power... (including making the huge batteries and plastics)

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by drtillberg on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @03:15PM (#14547701)
Gold glitters like pyrite, but the latter is not scarce and therefore not valuable. For both gold and ETH, it is scarcity, in combination with the network effect, that is critical.

For gold, scarcity is enforced by laws of nature, which encourages networks to treat it as valuable. For BTC, is there a similar constraint? I'm pretty sure the tokens can be reverse-transmutated by the software that counts it. This is true for all cryptocurrencies. Gold today and pyrite (or worse) tomorrow, which would make all of them unsuitable as long-term stores of value.

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by someSven on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @03:50PM (#14548011)
> What is the intrinsic value of ETH or Bitcoin? It literally has nothing to back it.

The brand and the places where you can pay or donate with it, or exchange it. The fact that it can't be seized by the authorities, the limit on inflation wired into the software and system. And thats most likely not all of it.

Re:Why Ethereum is outpacing Bitcoin by 52-6F-62 on Tuesday June 13, 2017 @02:24PM (#14547257)
Except a large number of companies committed to development and experimentation with the ETH blockchain.

See: https://entethalliance.org/members/