None of that is relevant to the ability of “traditional economics” to decide between being a descriptive and a normative field, as all are examples of hypothesized predictive models, not normative ones. They may seem naive from the perspective of a field focussed on behavior at a more micro level (even microeconomics aims at predicting higher-level aggregate behavior than psychology), and, heck, they may even be hopelessly naive, but that's not even German e to the question.

(And whether or not an economist was there to put an imprimatur on it, all of those descriptions are mischaracterizations, but again that's neither here nor there.)