Re:Toronto eyes plan to crack down on Airbnb-style rentals
by philfrasty on Monday June 12, 2017 @06:56PM
(#14541795)
„...buying a place just to put on Airbnb in Toronto is hard to do in a profitable way...“
So you are saying it is more profitable to rent out longterm than short-term? Totally not my experience. Hosts on Airbnb easily make 3x to 4x the usual rent (Munich, Germany), even far outside the city center. But might be purely city related...
Re:Toronto eyes plan to crack down on Airbnb-style rentals
by kbos87 on Monday June 12, 2017 @07:09PM
(#14541871)
Looking purely at cash flow, it isn't profitable to buy and rent out an apartment in a lot of American cities at least.
Re:Toronto eyes plan to crack down on Airbnb-style rentals
by Dave_TRS on Monday June 12, 2017 @07:26PM
(#14541943)
Agree. I have investment properties in a few cities, and consider airbnb only as an option of last resort to fill vacancies. The daily rates seem high on the surface, but the turnover, vacancies, risks, management costs all eat away at the profits.
Re:Toronto eyes plan to crack down on Airbnb-style rentals
by canistr on Monday June 12, 2017 @07:11PM
(#14541877)
I mostly agree. Tory's strategy seems to be optics first, policy second. Even if it means going against his more conservative principles. It doesn't really factor in the people who live in neighbourhoods/areas affected by poor Airbnb tenants/renters.
Re:Toronto eyes plan to crack down on Airbnb-style rentals
by megablast on Monday June 12, 2017 @09:17PM
(#14542328)
> and I think it's pretty clear that nobody actually believes
What does this even mean? You have done a survey?
And it is clearly just one of the many factors contributing to high housing and rental costs.
But many people have difficulty understanding a solution if a problem has more than one cause.
It's also worth mentioning that unlike NYC and SF where this may actually be a real issue, buying a place just to put on Airbnb in Toronto is hard to do in a profitable way. Airbnb rents in most parts of Toronto make it impossible to turn a profit worth the hassle, and most I know who have considered it decided not to based on the economics.
I suspect the political motivations are the mayor (who is generally sensible) wanting to be seen at least doing "something" to address rising rents, as well as catering to the various industry lobbies and other politicians who are generally uncomfortable with any industry operating in a largely unregulated way.