News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Living with nuclear waste means remembering on a differen... by DennisP on Sunday June 11, 2017 @09:31AM (#14531888)
It depends on the waste. The long-term waste is mostly plutonium and other transuranics; fast reactors can use that as fuel. The remaining collection of fission products goes back to the radioactivity of the original ore in two or three centuries.

Russia has two fast reactors in commercial operation, and various companies are working on their own designs.

Re:Living with nuclear waste means remembering on a differen... by justinator on Sunday June 11, 2017 @12:39PM (#14532622)
I guess it's not that simple. Say you have a factory that made Plutonium triggers and that same factory was pretty awful at following safety and containment protocol. Now that Plutonium is in very low levels within the actual soil of where the now decommissioned plant resides. Do you mine that soil for the Plutonium, or do you make all that soil nuclear waste?

In Colorado, we've decided to open up the area as a Wildlife Refuge.

http://e360.yale.edu/features/rocky_flats_wildlife_refuge_co...

Re:Living with nuclear waste means remembering on a differen... by DennisP on Sunday June 11, 2017 @04:06PM (#14533510)
Plutonium triggers have nothing to do with nuclear power. The nuclear bomb industry has a horrific environmental record, which isn't surprising considering what they were building.

If the plutonium is valuable fuel instead of waste, then a commercial operation has a good incentive to hold on to it, even aside from the regulations that commercial power has to deal with.

Re:Living with nuclear waste means remembering on a differen... by saboot on Sunday June 11, 2017 @04:17PM (#14533554)
Yes, after a few hundred years you've got a pretty good source for weapons grade plutonium
Re:Living with nuclear waste means remembering on a differen... by DennisP on Sunday June 11, 2017 @05:03PM (#14533776)
No, the point is the plutonium is gone because you've fissioned it in your reactor.