Re:Intel fires warning shots at Microsoft, says x86 emulatio...
by emodendroket on Sunday June 11, 2017 @08:52AM
(#14531777)
There seems to be a lot of mingling here of the way things ought to be and the way they are.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel fires warning shots at Microsoft, says x86 emulatio...
by Malician on Sunday June 11, 2017 @11:34AM
(#14532325)
Reminds me of a list of "copyright myths" I saw in school.
The first nine were, "you think you can do this simple thing, this reasonable thing, or have any freedom whatsoever? SCREW YOU."
The tenth claimed it was a myth that copyright levied oppressive burdens on the consumer.
Lesson: With any type of intellectual property protection, you can usually just presume it works in the most totally disgusting way imaginable.
Re:Intel fires warning shots at Microsoft, says x86 emulatio...
by emodendroket on Sunday June 11, 2017 @01:38PM
(#14532864)
Laws operating in a grotesque and unfair way is hardly confined to intellectual property law.
Re:Intel fires warning shots at Microsoft, says x86 emulatio...
by wayn3 on Sunday June 11, 2017 @09:23AM
(#14531871)
there is. i have no idea how things actually are.
but laws should not contradict common sense.
Re:Intel fires warning shots at Microsoft, says x86 emulatio...
by emodendroket on Sunday June 11, 2017 @01:38PM
(#14532865)
But they often do.