Morally, I'd say the ex-employee doesn't have a leg to stand on. If the employee had been wronged and their actions only negatively impacted the employer, then I'd be sympathetic, but all of Verelox's customers have been damaged, some of them perhaps irreparably, by this. Getting back at your employer with such huge amounts of collateral damage is never acceptable.
I find it hugely improbably that ex-admin's situation entailed being wronged by all of the customers whom he impacted by this action.
You are basically justifying the 'killing of innocents' here..
Re:Verelox Wiped by Ex-Admin
by jessaustin on Sunday June 11, 2017 @08:11AM
(#14531653)
If we assume that the firm did awful things to the employee, we can't also consider those who employed the firm to do those awful things "innocent".
If you treat people bad, they'll treat you bad. If you nuke Russia, Russia will nuke you. It's the Nash Equillibrium where each party is faced with a game and certain situations call for your best move. But your best move should account for what I'll do, and that should be factored into your initial move.
Mutually assured destruction is actually a powerful deterrent. Do we know what the ex-admin's situation was prior to all this? Only then should we pass judgement.