Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by empath75 on Friday June 09, 2017 @05:50AM
(#14520294)
Is it just me or is the illustration of 'graphs' of totally the wrong kind of graphs? I'm sure they don't mean bar charts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by Sean1708 on Friday June 09, 2017 @11:31AM
(#14522092)
It didn't even dawn on me that that figure was supposed to represent graphs until I read your comment (and then the caption), I had just assumed it was supposed to represent Big Data.
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by angstrom on Friday June 09, 2017 @06:54AM
(#14520513)
Yeah, they missed including a pie chart and a gantt chart for good measure.
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by mring33621 on Friday June 09, 2017 @08:05AM
(#14520790)
Most of the industry has moved on to Deep Pie Charts.
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by cat199 on Friday June 09, 2017 @10:45AM
(#14521727)
FYI, they're called 'chicago charts' for those in the know...
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by qntty on Friday June 09, 2017 @09:19AM
(#14521134)
Yeah, a bit embarrassing for a magazine that covers technology, HIVE defintely works on graph-theory graphs. Even weirder is the (Source: DARPA) attribution.
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by droopyEyelids on Friday June 09, 2017 @11:34AM
(#14522112)
Also they say the processor will use "1000 times less energy". Incredibly confused thinking goes into writing a sentence like that.
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by roywiggins on Friday June 09, 2017 @10:15AM
(#14521491)
Maybe an Igon Value Problem?
Re:Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
by mackncheesiest on Friday June 09, 2017 @08:19PM
(#14525531)
That would make sense to me.
I had to stop and chuckle when I saw the author put "[John] von Neumann architecture..." when quoting somebody who was simply talking about the industry standard term of "von Neumann architecture".
What's next? "[Alan] Turing machines"?