News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How not to build a ship: the USS Ford by killjoywashere on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @11:10PM (#14511613)
The big issue is that the EMALS system is easier on the airframes. In a conventional steam catapult, the steam head hits the piston face at max pressure and expands as it accelerates the aircraft, but max acceleration occurs at the beginning. This means there's much more load on the aluminium components of the airframes. As aluminium has no elastic limit, all deformation is bad. The Navy goes through a lot of airframes compared to the air force.

The EMALS system is intended to spread the load out continuously during take-off so the max load is much lower, thereby dramatically increasing the lifespan of the airframes.

Re:How not to build a ship: the USS Ford by zaroth on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @11:29PM (#14511697)
Intended, yes, except it actually fails to do this currently and potentially indefinitely.
Re:How not to build a ship: the USS Ford by myrandomcomment on Thursday June 08, 2017 @11:07AM (#14514684)
There was a more balanced story awhile back that talked about this in detail and it said they believe they can make software tweaks and a few other changes to resolve that. However they where not 100% and where doing testing.