Five years of IPv6: whither the next five?

Re:Five years of IPv6: whither the next five? by 2bluesc on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @06:00PM (#14501801)

> Another major source of IPv6 traffic that most people are unaware of it the cell networks. Most cellphone providers use IPv6.

Yes. I have T-Mobile in SF, and going to test-ipv6.com shows "10/10 readiness score".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Five years of IPv6: whither the next five? by soloadventurer on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @09:49PM (#14503109)

0/10 here, on Cellcard in Cambodia. No IPv6 address detected, but the DNS server appears to have IPv6 internet access.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Five years of IPv6: whither the next five? by epx on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @07:57PM (#14502602)

Idem here 10/10 (Brazil/Vivo-Telefónica). My cable ISP has had IPv6/ CGNAT but they backed away for now, perhaps due to problems in some users

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Five years of IPv6: whither the next five? by technofiend on Wednesday June 07, 2017 @09:18AM (#14506133)

Same 10/10 score with Google's Project Fi which just resells T-Mobile, Sprint and US Cellular service.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Five years of IPv6: whither the next five? by imron on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @07:47PM (#14502562)

I get 0/10 on mobile in Taiwan.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Five years of IPv6: whither the next five? by epx on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @07:57PM (#14502603)

Idem here 10/10 (Brazil/Vivo-Telefónica). My cable ISP has had IPv6/ CGNAT but they backed away for now, perhaps due to problems in some users

[ Parent | on HN ]