News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WSJ Ends Google Users' Free Ride, Then Fades in Search Re... by 2_listerine_pls on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:19PM (#14491428)
I went through the whole thing and it seems, from the video, that they could avoid cloaking by redirecting non-paid users to the sing-up page.

This way WSJ would be showing the same (www.wsj.com/Bezos-with-hair) to every user.

*based on the video

Re:WSJ Ends Google Users' Free Ride, Then Fades in Search Re... by squeaky-clean on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:57PM (#14491955)
In the video, he stresses pretty hard that all forms of cloaking are disallowed, even if not malicious or deceiving. Unless the Googlebot has a paid subscription to WSJ that's still cloaking, as you're showing Googlebot a different page than a regular user.

Google's rules and help documents are spread all over, but here's some from Google News about subscriptions:

"If you prefer this option, please display a snippet of your article that is at least 80 words long and includes either an excerpt or a summary of the specific article. Since we do not permit "cloaking" -- the practice of showing Googlebot a full version of your article while showing users the subscription or registration version -- we will only crawl and display your content based on the article snippets you provide."

edit, forgot link: https://support.google.com/news/publisher/answer/40543?hl=en

Re:WSJ Ends Google Users' Free Ride, Then Fades in Search Re... by jacquesm on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:38PM (#14491702)
> sing-up page.

That's a new one. Buy a subscription to the WSJ now for a song.