News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:iMac Pro by jdboyd on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:19PM (#14491418)
The Thunderbolt 3 ports are each somewhere in the neighborhood of the bandwidth of a PCIe 8x slot, arguably giving this about the approximately the expandability of an HP or Dell single socket workstation.

I'm not saying this should be preferred to a traditional tower, just that it isn't fair to say it has no expandability.

Re:iMac Pro by qubex on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:25PM (#14491529)
I'm of the internal-cards over external-cables school of thought. I've been plugging circuit boards into backplanes since the S-100 bus era, and I'm very much committed to the idea of a discrete computer chassis containing all the major computing components as a distinct entity compared to the screen. I still have desktop machines because of this.
Re:iMac Pro by MrFlynn on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:27PM (#14491551)
Thunderbolt 3 ports are closer to PCIe 3.0 x4, not x8. Regardless it won't cause a huge performance hit depending on your workload (about 5-10% slower in gaming benchmarks). But YMMV with applications that require more bandwidth.
Re:iMac Pro by DuskStar on Monday June 05, 2017 @04:28PM (#14491566)
I mean, the Trashcan Mac Pro had Thunderbolt expandability too. But that doesn't seem to have been as much as people were hoping for then.
Re:iMac Pro by emptythought on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @11:17AM (#14497873)
which then need 2-500 chassis, or overpriced RAID arrays to do anything useful with...