Re:Is Google far too much in love with engineering?
by stcredzero on Monday June 21, 2010 @11:02AM
(#1448991)
The question should be: Is cluelessness in "soft skills" worse than technical cluelessness? Really, both are bad. (Example: Cuil)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Is Google far too much in love with engineering?
by arethuza on Monday June 21, 2010 @12:30PM
(#1449269)
Google's success wasn't so much coming up with the best web search technology but finding a way of converting that to billions of dollars in revenues and profits.
To me Google have excelled at both the technology and the marketing - which is why they are so successful.
Having said that, if you can't manage to be good at both technology and marketing, I suspect that you are better off being weak at technology than marketing. Plenty companies thrive with average/poor technology but an excellent understanding of what the market wants. I've known plenty companies (some from the inside) where the technology was good but the marketing was weak - things generally don't turn out too well.
Re:Is Google far too much in love with engineering?
by stretchwithme on Monday June 21, 2010 @12:34PM
(#1449282)
Agreed. Anyone that tries big things often enough will have both successes and failures.
And I do seem to recall an overwhelming success like Windows starting off as somewhat of a failure.