If racist jerks end up actually oppressed instead of having to deal with the consequences of their very specific and very active choices (which stand in stark contrast to the genetic/external-social of "race"), I am entirely and one hundred percent onboard with having a conversation about whether society is made better by considering them a protected class. I will not hold my breath on either the likelihood of that oppression nor on whether society is made better by enabling them.

Do you have an actual argument, or are you just whatabouting?

I gave my argument, you responded to it with an incorrect nitpick, I corrected you, you tried to dig your way out, and here we are now.