News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016) by Bakary on Monday June 05, 2017 @11:57AM (#14488537)
It's harsh in the sense that not only is there a tiny amount of it that can be safely occupied by humans, but also that the sliver we do have can be easily wiped out by random events, and will be inevitably destroyed in a few million years.
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016) by bamboozled on Monday June 05, 2017 @07:15PM (#14493176)
Maybe it takes all that perceived harshness to produce something special?
Re:The Argument Against Terraforming Mars (2016) by Bakary on Tuesday June 06, 2017 @11:57AM (#14498193)
Your earlier comment got me thinking a little more. It's hard to disagree with your logic: since we are there and able to talk about it, that makes the Universe already rather compassionate. In fact, there is no other place to compare its possible harshness to.

However, it's a bit like a parent abusing their child. The kid owes everything it has to their progenitor, but it's questionable whether their existence is worth something to begin with. Even without a frame of reference, I believe you can make the judgment that something is in fact harsh. The very fact that we can conceive of asking this question makes it a possibility. In an easier world we might not even consider it at all.