News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Higher-level causation exists (but I wish it didn’t). Parent comment

Re:Higher-level causation exists (but I wish it didn’t) by sidlls on Sunday June 04, 2017 @09:10PM (#14484674)
Not necessarily. Some articles of this sort are so skew to reason that they defy refutation by virtue of how far out of bounds they are.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Higher-level causation exists (but I wish it didn’t) by Mathnerd314 on Sunday June 04, 2017 @09:12PM (#14484682)
They're "not even wrong" (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong), just a waste of time
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Higher-level causation exists (but I wish it didn’t) by zepto on Sunday June 04, 2017 @11:36PM (#14485110)
Can you say why this article is not even wrong?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Higher-level causation exists (but I wish it didn’t) by ue_ on Sunday June 04, 2017 @10:40PM (#14484961)
Then you should be able to say in what way the reason was skewed, or why it's invalid, even if it's out of bounds.
[ Parent | on HN ]