News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on On average, skipping college and investing tuition costs nets a higher return. Parent comment

Re:On average, skipping college and investing tuition costs ... by muninn_ on Sunday June 04, 2017 @06:49PM (#14484106)
While the college coach is often highly paid, keep in mind that the football program usually brings in a boatload of money, and that money goes on to subsidize other NCAA sports and in many cases even returns money back to the university.

I'm not a fan of the sports-fetish of college sports, but I do want to make a balanced point for others to consider.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On average, skipping college and investing tuition costs ... by prostoalex on Monday June 05, 2017 @03:49AM (#14485951)
> football program usually brings in a boatload of money

Let's ask some nice people at NCAA to quantify those boatloads.

http://www.businessinsider.com/ncaa-revenue-expense-report-2...

"Of the 120 athletic departments in Division I-A (sorry, the Football Bowl Subdivision) just 22 were self-sufficient last year. That's actually actually an improvement from 2009, when only 14 schools turned a "profit.""

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:On average, skipping college and investing tuition costs ... by muninn_ on Monday June 05, 2017 @12:15PM (#14488766)
And as your link says 58% of football programs are self-sufficient. Your link is also referring to sports programs as a whole. So yeah cut out all the women's sports and even more will be self-sustaining (not that I'm advocating that). And, it appears that more programs are making more money as time goes on.

So sure boatload could be a mischaracterization, but majority certainly isn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]