Re:GNU Shepherd
by openasocket on Saturday June 03, 2017 @11:54AM
(#14476945)
So you want to programmatically edit a config file, preserving formatting and comments, without using regexes, AST visitors, or XSLT? What's left? I seriously don't know of any other ways to manipulate data while preserving formatting and comments.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
This isn't applicable to scheme as a config format, but some config formats are line based and have programmatic tools to manipulate them, e.g. the .ini-like format Git uses, try adding some comments to ~/.gitconfig and manipulating it with `git config --global <...>`, it'll all be preserved.
You will lose any comments like this though:
[user]
name = My Name ; that's my name!
$ cat my-config.xml
<root>
<!-- i am a comment -->
<thing attr="foo">
<!-- i am another comment -->
<setting>value</setting>
</thing>
</root>
$ cat c.py
import lxml.etree
doc = lxml.etree.fromstring(file('my-config.xml').read())
for setting in doc.xpath('.//thing/setting'):
setting.text = 'set without screwing up the file'
print lxml.etree.tostring(doc)
$ python c.py
<root>
<!-- i am a comment -->
<thing attr="foo">
<!-- i am another comment -->
<setting>set without screwing up the file</setting>
</thing>
</root>
Re:GNU Shepherd
by openasocket on Saturday June 03, 2017 @02:18PM
(#14477645)
... but you just chewed someone out for suggesting XML. And you are doing tree walking here, you're just reducing some of the boilerplate with XPath. You can do the same thing with Scheme using car, cdr, cadr and friends.
The suggestion was to use XSLT to transform Scheme syntax
Re:GNU Shepherd
by openasocket on Saturday June 03, 2017 @02:44PM
(#14477787)
My mistake then. You can still use car, cdr, cadr etc. to accomplish more or less the same thing as XPath. S-expressions are a completely valid serialization format. You can't easily manipulate JSON or YAML data while preserving formatting and comments with any library I've used (though it is possible), that doesn't mean JSON and YAML are invalid.