News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Maybe we shouldn't skip SHA-3 by kozak on Friday June 02, 2017 @10:45AM (#14470247)
Let's say I make a hash of an asset and put it into a very long-time archive (like 100 years or whatever). What checksum algorithm should I use to be sure it will be readily available in software after 100 years? And to make the choice more realistic, let's assume that the algorithm must be sufficiently fast today (like md5 is).
Re:Maybe we shouldn't skip SHA-3 by dom0 on Friday June 02, 2017 @12:54PM (#14471391)
The answer is that you don't want a hash, you want a solution that is ArchiSig or TR-ESOR (or something similar) compliant.