I'm not a Rust guy, so take this with a grain of salt, but I was under the impression that Rust did a great job with C interoperability, which is all you need for writing Python extensions. Some hasty googling brings up https://github.com/PyO3/setuptools-rust, which appears to be exactly the thing you're asking for. In other words, it's not heavily advertised, but it appears to be entirely feasible to build Python extensions in Rust, and not spectacularly complicated either.
Re:Progress on the Gilectomy
by steveklabnik on Friday June 02, 2017 @11:26AM
(#14470570)
The language does do great at the core of it, but there's a lot of stuff that makes it easier that's not the language's job.
compare https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.2.0/book/rust-inside-other-langu... to http://usehelix.com/ for example; the former is only using what the language knows, the latter is a nice library built on top.
There's been some effort for nicer Python integration, but I haven't seen anything super super slick yet.
Re:Progress on the Gilectomy
by crdoconnor on Friday June 02, 2017 @11:11AM
(#14470445)
>Some hasty googling brings up https://github.com/PyO3/setuptools-rust, which appears to be exactly the thing you're asking for.
Yeah, I've tried it and it didn't work.
It's certainly feasible it's just not very well developed.
No to threading, but yes to tighter integration with rust.
Ah yes, let's not focus on something python is not. Let's appeal to the majority use case.
What minor planet are people here from?
It would be nicer if instead of trying to turn python into something it is not (a language for writing CPU intensive tasks), it was made better at what it is (glue code).
It would be especially nice if there were tighter, more seamless integration between python and rust so that hot paths in python can easily be migrated to rust.