News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Science was ignored today by JohnLeTigre on Thursday June 01, 2017 @04:33PM (#14464338)
That's odd, I didn't know that gender equality affected the climate.
Re:Science was ignored today by tnzn on Friday June 02, 2017 @05:46AM (#14468698)
Gender equality means more women can have a job, so more people to go work, more cars, more carbon footprint. For instance.
Re:Science was ignored today by JohnLeTigre on Friday June 02, 2017 @10:10AM (#14469982)
If gender equality has a negative effect on the climate (ie. more cars, more refined produce consumed, etc), why would they have this as a requirement in the Paris accord?

I guess where I was getting at is that they seemed to have used this agreement to push a westernized social agenda. Considering that every country is sovereign, I'm not sure this is a proper approach.

Mind you, I would love to have gender equality across the world but it would be preferable to offer opt-in approaches.