Re:Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, ana...
by DennisP on Thursday June 01, 2017 @02:30PM
(#14463036)
Ethereum does the same thing as Bitcoin. It's just that you can also have scripts on the network that move money around.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, ana...
by zenlikethat on Friday June 02, 2017 @06:37PM
(#14473798)
That's as much a liability as it is an asset -- for instance, https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/6eruqb/if_your_ex... ("QuadrigaCX exchange lost 60000 Ether due to smart contract problems").
Re:Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, ana...
by DennisP on Saturday June 03, 2017 @10:36AM
(#14476546)
You have to be careful, but people have gotten a lot better at being careful. The contract used by QuadrigaCX was written last summer, and violated a well-known best practice, which is no longer necessary due to an improvement in Solidity. Human error is always a problem, but these days it's common to hire at least one security auditor for any contract that handles nontrivial amounts of money. (I'm a full-time Solidity dev/auditor.)
It's still a little scary, but I'd say it's less scary than safety-critical embedded code.