Re:Tesla fires female engineer who alleged sexual harassment
by softawre on Thursday June 01, 2017 @10:27AM
(#14460514)
They didn't mention "b/c she was a woman" at all.
Re:Tesla fires female engineer who alleged sexual harassment
by ocdtrekkie on Thursday June 01, 2017 @10:17AM
(#14460396)
Tesla says, and Vandermeyden says something else. But if this is going to court, I suspect the outcome is very much going to depend on which party can prove their side of the story.
Re:Tesla fires female engineer who alleged sexual harassment
by jasonlotito on Thursday June 01, 2017 @10:48AM
(#14460696)
> Tesla isn't merely claiming they've met her needs, they're actually claiming that she's received privileged treatment because she's a woman:
If that's true, they are admitting to sexual discrimination and opening themselves up to further lawsuits.
Re:Tesla fires female engineer who alleged sexual harassment
by NotSammyHagar on Thursday June 01, 2017 @11:47AM
(#14461294)
I didn't see where they said it was special treatment b/c she was a woman. They just said it was special treatment (based on my reading of the article).
Re:Tesla fires female engineer who alleged sexual harassment
by JoeAltmaier on Thursday June 01, 2017 @10:17AM
(#14460404)
Wow they must be really screwed up at Tesla then.
> Tesla added that Vandermeyden had been granted numerous positions “over other more qualified candidates” and was “given special treatment and opportunities for advancement that were unwarranted based on her qualifications”.