A penny being the smallest unit of currency. So he's simply stating that he'll not take any more money in recognition of the fact that he was very well compensated.
This implicitly discounts the possibility to reduce the amount of money he'd take - and so if that's something the barristers wanted to do they'd have to explicitly bring it up. Which, I think we can all agree, would be simply too awful to contemplate.
In making so, the cost/risk of the Clerk was minimised compared, in modern language, to changing vendor. There were no more hidden costs.
No idea why you were downvoted.
He said "I'm not going to take a penny more [than 10%] from you."
They heard "I'm not going to take a penny more [than all the money I have already taken] from you."
They were too polite to press the case once the misunderstanding became apparent.