News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Maybe Skip SHA-3 by pshc on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @08:14PM (#14456932)
I recently came to believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that the recommended XOFs SHAKE128 and SHAKE256 are actually nice and fast, but often when people talk about SHA-3 they focus on the slower "drop-in replacements" like SHA3-256 which are quite conservative.
Re:Maybe Skip SHA-3 by baby on Thursday June 01, 2017 @05:12AM (#14458897)
Yes SHAKE is faster than SHA-3 because of "better" parameter choices.