News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive. Parent comment

Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by mikeash on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @02:01PM (#14454586)
How so? The movie shows them going from A to B, physics says going from A to B takes far more delta-v than the spacecraft would have, therefore it's a physics issue. It would be like a WWII movie showing a bomber taking off from NYC and bombing Berlin.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by _dingus on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @03:19PM (#14455175)
>It would be like a WWII movie showing a bomber taking off from NYC and bombing Berlin.

NYC to Berlin is well within the originally required flight range of the B-29 (5,333mi at 400mph with a 2k lbs load). It wouldn't be an intelligent thing to do, but it isn't physically impossible.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by mikeash on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @07:28PM (#14456726)
I was thinking of a round-trip mission, but I always appreciate nitpickery. (And I learned just how much carrying a heavy bomb load affected the range of the B-29!)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by Symmetry on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @02:16PM (#14454723)
The Tiangong in the movie isn't a real space station so if the Chinese were to build it they could put it in any orbit they like, even one hypothetically 10m/s of delta-v away from the ISS and there might even be realistic reasons for them want to be energetically close to the ISS. There are reasons not to do it but if there's a good reason like the Chinese want to keep the option of physically linking to the ISS open then there's nothing actually preventing it.

So it isn't two known and far distant locations like New York and Berlin, its more like New York and an unnamed city.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by dragonwriter on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @02:53PM (#14454967)
> The Tiangong in the movie isn't a real space station

It's a real space station name. The one they use is much bigger than the real station with the name, but it might be intended to be a future development, or it could be a fictional station with the same name (a city called New York, but with a population of 200 million and located in central France, to borrow your analogy), or they could have just intended the existing station and not bothered to research anything about it besides it's name and nationality.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by mikeash on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @02:21PM (#14454760)
That wouldn't make much sense, but even if we grant that, just switch the complaint to Hubble and ISS. We know where both of those are.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Kerbal Space Program Acquired by Take-Two Interactive by exDM69 on Thursday June 01, 2017 @04:26AM (#14458744)
When that movie came out, I was studying a basic astronomy course at the university and we were going through some simple orbital mechanics. We had a long discussion about can the debris of Hubble hit the ISS or not.

The conclusion was probably not, but under perfect storm circumstances (and especially timing) a fragment or two might not be out of the question.

[ Parent | on HN ]