News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brave raises $35M in 1 min with ICO by dharma1 on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @01:27PM (#14454294)
Equity in a company and the tokens the company issues are two separate entities. The tokens only have value because people speculate on them (though some tokens promise to distribute revenue to the token holders through smart contracts in the future).

It's possible we see companies in the future that exist solely on the blockchain and don't have a legal entity, and tokens effectively are shares in the company, with voting rights. But that's not what we have today.

Re:Brave raises $35M in 1 min with ICO by gcp on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @01:52PM (#14454510)
The tokens only have value because people speculate on them

This is a bit weirdly stated for this case, I believe. The Brave tokens have value because they offer advertising space in the browser. You're speculating on the value of that advertising space, not so much on an altcoin/token itself.

Re:Brave raises $35M in 1 min with ICO by dharma1 on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @02:13PM (#14454694)
Yep, as I said some tokens have smart contracts to distribute revenue - I don't know enough about Brave to say whether that's in effect immediately or something they plan to do in the future.

BAT tokens are already tradable on exchanges, and currently trading at 3x ICO price. The pricing is primarily speculative