Re:All AMD ThreadRipper CPU's will have 64 PCIe Lanes
by maksimum on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @02:03PM
(#14454605)
> A full recompile takes me ~1 hr
Could you explain why full recompiles on a single machine are necessary? Are you testing different compiler settings?
Re:All AMD ThreadRipper CPU's will have 64 PCIe Lanes
by drewg123 on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @03:14PM
(#14455126)
I work remotely, and it is easier to develop and compile on the same box. I normally compile just the kernel, but occasionally have to rebuild the entire thing.
Re:All AMD ThreadRipper CPU's will have 64 PCIe Lanes
by yazr on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @03:28PM
(#14455225)
What makefile/build system r u using ?
I am curious since i did some work on parallel builds and I always wonder how much of this is (easily) transferable to other setups...
Re:All AMD ThreadRipper CPU's will have 64 PCIe Lanes
by drewg123 on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @04:07PM
(#14455498)
A modified version of the standard FreeBSD build, with bsd make. Eg, a script driven 'make -j X buildworld && make -j X buildkernel'
Re:All AMD ThreadRipper CPU's will have 64 PCIe Lanes
by yazr on Thursday June 01, 2017 @02:43PM
(#14463184)
if you had access to a hosted build system, which is x10 faster. lets even assume some sort of transparent gradual sync of your source tree, and the binaries back to your system.
would u find value in such a setup or is it not worth the hassle ?
(lets assume the output is veritably binary-identical to your local build)
I probably will do storage via a ZFS array of small-ish SSDs or NVME drives. I started with a ZFS array of spinning drives when I built this machine ~2 years ago, with an SSD for L2 ARC. I was occasionally IO bound, so I moved most of the build stuff onto its own SSD. That's probably enough, but I want redundancy (without spinning drives to back up to), and I suck at cabling, so I'm leaning towards just using NVME drives in PCIe slots in order to avoid the cables.