News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber Fires Anthony Levandowski by zaphar on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @08:16PM (#14449624)
Taking the fifth is not automatically a sign of guilt despite what some people might think.

As I understand it it's not out of the realm of possibility for a lawyer to advise doing so even for completely innocent clients. It's not hard to get tripped up on the stand and sound guilty even when you aren't.

Re:Uber Fires Anthony Levandowski by tjalfi on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @09:34PM (#14449898)
This. The video Don't Talk to the Police[0] has several concrete examples of how not taking the fifth amendment can be to your disadvantage.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE

Re:Uber Fires Anthony Levandowski by joshuamorton on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @11:18PM (#14450199)
This is not a criminal proceeding.
Re:Uber Fires Anthony Levandowski by kbenson on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @12:26AM (#14450418)
But the case has been referred to the authorities for a possible criminal case. In that light, there may be more reason to keep quiet.
Re:Uber Fires Anthony Levandowski by bradleyjg on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @10:41PM (#14450101)
It's one thing to take the fifth out of an abundance of caution when all it might do is raise some suspicion. It's another thing when doing so is likely to cost you $250MM. It's hard to look at this course of events and conclude that Levandowski probably did nothing wrong.