News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Early Linux filesystem reliability by marcosdumay on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @05:49PM (#14448819)
And, of course, in the early 00's those habits got ingrained into init scripts. Every distro would automatically run a fsck after a forced shutdown, and sync after the heaviest deamons were stopped.

Somehow, I remember filesystems to be more reliable by them, and the time needed for the fsck being the biggest issue. Then we had a Red Hat person demonstrate a forced reboot in a computer running ReiserFS in my university, and I think in the next month no computing student was suing Ext2 anymore.

Re:Early Linux filesystem reliability by Florin_Andrei on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @06:48PM (#14449195)
> the time needed for the fsck being the biggest issue

Right, that was always a big problem.

Re:Early Linux filesystem reliability by jk2323 on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @12:53AM (#14450490)
You mean "using"? I always was happy with ReiserFS. What a pity.
Re:Early Linux filesystem reliability by marcosdumay on Wednesday May 31, 2017 @10:56AM (#14452999)
In the end EXT3 became much better anyway. It just took some time.