Re:Peer Community in X: A free recommendation process of sci...
by SubiculumCode on Sunday May 28, 2017 @01:44PM
(#14435339)
To discuss how a paper is wrong you have to first cite the paper. The need to discuss bad papers can arise for a number of reasons. So some papers cite rank != quality.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Peer Community in X: A free recommendation process of sci...
by carbocation on Sunday May 28, 2017 @02:07PM
(#14435429)
True. Pagerank is "importance" rather than "quality". But as your network of recommenders becomes larger and starts to approximate the scientific community as a whole, I'd imagine that there will be convergence. If not, that would be a welcome and (to me) surprising result.