News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Year of Google and Apple Maps by olegkikin on Saturday May 27, 2017 @09:18PM (#14432692)
It's interesting that in Manhattan they removed "Greenwich Village", but added "230 Fifth Rooftop Bar" and "Vinegar Hill". That makes no sense to me.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54ff63f0e4b0bafce6932...

Even according to Google Trends "Greenwich village" is 6.5 times more popular than "Vinegar Hill", let alone some rooftop bar.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=Greenwich%20Villa...

Re:A Year of Google and Apple Maps by twoodfin on Saturday May 27, 2017 @09:44PM (#14432753)
Aren't the places Google Maps chooses to highlight a function of your account history? Certainly seems that way to me.

Anyway, Greenwich Village still shows up as a neighborhood label at a range of zoom levels, just not the particular scale for this image.

Re:A Year of Google and Apple Maps by ProAm on Saturday May 27, 2017 @10:49PM (#14432903)
> Aren't the places Google Maps chooses to highlight a function of your account history?

Google has become good at telling you what you used to know versus what you want to discover

Re:A Year of Google and Apple Maps by kevincox on Sunday May 28, 2017 @05:17AM (#14433656)
I disagree. Places that I have visited serve as excellent landmarks. I wouldn't want them to be the only thing on the map but having them dusted around makes it very easy for me to know where new places are.
Re:A Year of Google and Apple Maps by grey-area on Sunday May 28, 2017 @12:58AM (#14433138)
Google makes money from place entries (booking ads, place ads) but not from geographic place names, this alone explains the move. Think of the places selected as ads at the top of your search results.
Re:A Year of Google and Apple Maps by cmurf on Saturday May 27, 2017 @09:44PM (#14432752)
Maybe you (as a business) can pay to be visible at a certain zoom level? That'd be a kind of advertising, and Google is in the advertising business.