News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dat – Distributed Dataset Synchronization and Versioning by rspeer on Friday May 26, 2017 @10:39AM (#14424351)
I used to keep it in SQLite (much easier to distribute than PostgreSQL). It worked a lot better than many other options I tried. However, rebuilding the database from updated data would take more than a day, and some queries were too slow.

Switching to PostgreSQL sped things up, at the cost of requiring a separate database process, dealing with psql's weird access control, and adding an inconvenient step of loading the data using COPY commands.

Re:Dat – Distributed Dataset Synchronization and Versioning by justinclift on Friday May 26, 2017 @01:23PM (#14425720)
Hmmm, sounds like the data itself would be feasible then. SQLite could be considered just a data transport container for this purpose. :)