Re:GM accused of installing devices in diesel trucks to beat...
by r00fus on Thursday May 25, 2017 @02:49PM
(#14419250)
The problem with "everyone cheats" is that we don't have proof of that. We're seeing proof that multiple companies have cheated so far... hopefully the punishments are equivalent.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GM accused of installing devices in diesel trucks to beat...
by thinkling on Thursday May 25, 2017 @05:51PM
(#14420420)
Once you have the necessary portable emissions testing equipment, how much work is it to test a vehicle?
I've been wondering why the researchers at WVU who found the VW cheating have not gone on to test a larger set of vehicles to see who else is cheating.
Re:GM accused of installing devices in diesel trucks to beat...
by jessaustin on Thursday May 25, 2017 @07:18PM
(#14420872)
Do we know the researchers haven't tested other vehicles? If VW were cheating to a greater degree than other manufacturers, that might explain why they were the first to be caught.
Re:GM accused of installing devices in diesel trucks to beat...
by thinkling on Friday May 26, 2017 @12:39PM
(#14425341)
Yes, they weren't doing this on their own initiative, they had a contract to test 4 specific vehicles of which 3 were VW TDIs, I think. They didn't initially think they'd found cheating, and it took a year or two for CARB to get interested and things to develop.
You'd think someone would fund broader testing...
Re:GM accused of installing devices in diesel trucks to beat...
by iamthepieman on Thursday May 25, 2017 @03:36PM
(#14419553)
they are all cheating and the punishments won't be equivalent (I assume you mean to the amount of damages and money they made during the cheating period on the cheating vehicles)
But you're right, we don't have proof right now. I think the logical proof, that other companies are selling similar vehicles at similar price points that are "passing" the emissions testing is proof but obviously not of the legal variety.