Re:Kik Messenger App Debuts Own Digital Currency Amid Bitcoi...
by chickenfries on Thursday May 25, 2017 @12:29PM
(#14418312)
I think a lot of it was much ado over nothing, but I agree that if you didn't already mistrust tiny, anemic modules written by single developers in your production code that it was a good lesson.
Re:Kik Messenger App Debuts Own Digital Currency Amid Bitcoi...
by deletia on Thursday May 25, 2017 @12:31PM
(#14418326)
Exactly :)
A lot of larger companies affected needed a wake up call regardless.
Re:Kik Messenger App Debuts Own Digital Currency Amid Bitcoi...
by pooper on Monday May 29, 2017 @05:15AM
(#14438215)
The issue to me isn't the deletion of modules but rather the reassignment of modules. I'm completely ok with deleting modules. I am not ok with taking a name that used to exist and just giving it to someone else. That is the crime here not the deletion of modules. That should be the wake up call.
Arguably one of the best things to come out of that whole incident was NPM's realization that the (then) entire system of dependencies had a huge issue; that is, the fact that one pissed of developer could break a massive amount of production codebases.
IMHO the incident was a good learning experience for the JS community as a whole and really shouldn't be framed so negatively all the time.