News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Solving twenty-four puzzles by contravariant on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @09:08PM (#14414663)
Hmm, I think there also needs to be a rule that you can't have a numerator of 0, otherwise any case where you have an expression a * b = 0 with a = 0 then either b=0 or a / b = 0. So the restriction that you can't multiply by 0 becomes somewhat meaningless.
Re:Solving twenty-four puzzles by zmonx on Friday May 26, 2017 @08:17AM (#14423509)
The constraints I impose are sufficient to exclude such cases in multiplications: a/b is first evaluated, and if the result is 0, it is precluded from multiplications. To avoid also divisions resulting in 0, you are right: We can easily constrain the nominator to express this, completely analogously to multiplication. This goes beyond the initial requirements though.