How I Almost Got Acquired By Apple And Then Snubbed

Re:How I Almost Got Acquired By Apple And Then Snubbed by pyre on Thursday June 17, 2010 @08:37PM (#1440906)

Emailing the CEO because some engineer isn't responding promptly enough to your emails isn't a good way to get him on your side. From your perspective, he promised you something and you are trying to get him to deliver. From his perspective, you've just alerted the CEO of the company (multiple times) that maybe he's not being productive enough.

In general, it's not a good way to get this guy to give you a green light on getting hired/acquired.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How I Almost Got Acquired By Apple And Then Snubbed by dcx on Friday June 18, 2010 @12:37AM (#1441354)

That's so true! In fact I can sort of see the corporate pattern:

1. Steve -> Engineer: Whats with the delay?

At this point, almost nothing the engineer could say shows him in a good light - "sick" doesn't cut it at the power difference here. You only talk to the CEO once in a decade, and his experience of you is "doesn't deliver"?

2. Engineer -> Steve: I evaluated it. It sucks. I haven't written back yet as it's not a high priority.

3. Email from Steve -> Unfortunate dude: No interest.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How I Almost Got Acquired By Apple And Then Snubbed by danudey on Friday June 18, 2010 @01:28PM (#1442977)

Alternately:

1. Steve -> Manager: This guy e-mailed me again, does this need to be dealt with?

2. Manager -> Steve: It's a good algorithm, but the guy's been demanding and impatient, and with everyone prepping iOS/iPhone 4 for WWDC, Engineer just hasn't had time to look into it.

3. Steve -> Dude: No interest.

Specifically, I highly doubt that Steve Jobs would speak directly with an engineer about a potential acquisition of a potentially useful algorithm. I doubt it was ever really on his radar at all after the first 30 seconds where he read it and forwarded it off. That's the entire reason managers exist.

[ Parent | on HN ]