News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Porting Windows Dynamic Link Libraries to Linux. Parent comment

Re:Porting Windows Dynamic Link Libraries to Linux by analognoise on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @08:33PM (#14406683)
I've always thought why is more important than why not. Example: "I'm going to hit myself in the dick with a hammer."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting Windows Dynamic Link Libraries to Linux by int_19h on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @08:49PM (#14406769)
Your example has an obvious great answer to "why not?", though, so no harm done in asking that question first.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting Windows Dynamic Link Libraries to Linux by mirimir on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @12:07PM (#14411056)
Actually, that's not so problematic unless there's an anvil involved, or the hammer is moving quickly.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting Windows Dynamic Link Libraries to Linux by sqeaky on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @12:30PM (#14411227)
I still don't think its a problem. I can swing the hammer if AnalogNoise cannot build up sufficient speed.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Porting Windows Dynamic Link Libraries to Linux by bitwize on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @09:34PM (#14406967)
Well, why don't you MARRY safe science if you love it so much!! :)
[ Parent | on HN ]