Re:Uber Plans Millions in Back Pay After Shortchanging NYC D...
by Karunamon on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @02:50AM
(#14408027)
but your initial attitude should be "let's try to work within society's boundaries to achieve our goal"
Why on earth is that the case? This viewpoint imbues "society's boundaries" with some kind of a-priori correctness, when really it has the same as any other concept: 0, until proven otherwise.
Re:Uber Plans Millions in Back Pay After Shortchanging NYC D...
by burkaman on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @10:11AM
(#14410109)
It's not a-priori correctness, but a-priori precedence, or respect. You live in a society, you benefit from society, you would not be capable of starting a business without society, so you shouldn't casually dismiss society. Basically all I'm saying is that you need a good reason to break the rules. "This makes it harder for me to make money" is not a good reason. "There's no other way to achieve my worthwhile goal" is a good reason.
Re:Uber Plans Millions in Back Pay After Shortchanging NYC D...
by Karunamon on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @12:10PM
(#14411092)
Dismissing a restriction of society is not the same as dismissing society, in the same way that ignoring the speed limit or ripping your own music is not the same as ignoring the concept of law.
Re:Uber Plans Millions in Back Pay After Shortchanging NYC D...
by burkaman on Wednesday May 24, 2017 @12:30PM
(#14411222)
I agree, and you shouldn't ignore the speed limit or pirate music without good reason. I'm not saying follow the law at all costs, but give the law the benefit of the doubt. In a mostly democratic society, rules are often (obviously not always) there for good reason even if at a glance they seem pointless or wrong.
I'm just saying "move fast and break things" is not the only way to succeed, should not be a goal in and of itself, and Uber could have been just as successful without being so shitty to people.