Re:Last major primeval forest in Europe on 'brink of collapse'
by Swizec on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @02:46PM
(#14404002)
You are correct. There was a concept of rights, but not a concept of universal rights, which is how we understand "rights" today.
I stand corrected.
Re:Last major primeval forest in Europe on 'brink of collapse'
by clock_tower on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @05:26PM
(#14448681)
I wish you hadn't been downvoted; I upvoted you, for what it's worth. Thanks for your response!
A commoner couldn't sue a knight; a knight couldn't invest in a business; only Jews could loan money, but they couldn't use the proceeds to buy land. Two people could commit the same crime under the same circumstances and get completely different punishments, because one of them was a citizen of the city where the crime occurred and the other wasn't.
The Enlightenment's key innovation was to give everyone the same rights -- rejecting some rights (like immunity from lawsuit) as intrinsically unjust, and granting the rest to everyone.