News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Don't use Hadoop when your data isn't that big (2013) by logicfiction on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @12:16PM (#14402477)
If your workload can generally run in a non-distributed manner, then the operational overhead of dealing with Spark versus simpler paradigms will be expensive. That has been my first hand experience.
Re:Don't use Hadoop when your data isn't that big (2013) by nilkn on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @12:29PM (#14402627)
I think there's a middle tier of problems that don't need a distributed cluster but can still benefit from parallelism across, say, 30-40 cores, which you can easily get on a single node. Once you know how to use Spark, I haven't found there's much overhead or difficulty to running it in standalone mode.

I do agree in principle that you're better off using simpler tools like Postgres and Python if you can. But if you're in the middle band of "inconveniently sized" data, the small overhead of running Spark in standalone mode on a workstation might be less than the extra work you do to get the needed parallelism with simpler tools.

Re:Don't use Hadoop when your data isn't that big (2013) by threeseed on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @02:48PM (#14404034)
Spark can also run in a non-distributed manner.

And it's very simple to manage operationally if you know anything about JVM apps.