Re:The Future of Go Summit – Ke Jie vs. AlphaGo
by Houshalter on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @04:31PM
(#14405040)
I believe I was remembering this from wikipedia:
>In a similar matchup, AlphaGo running on multiple computers won all 500 games played against other Go programs, and 77% of games played against AlphaGo running on a single computer.
But the full version of AlphaGo that runs on thousands of computers is much stronger than that, so I was mistaken.
Still, the fact that the non-distributed version is so strong even without tree search is pretty amazing. It beat all existing Go playing programs a majority of the time. And with algorithmic advances and more training it may eventually catch up to best human players.
Re:The Future of Go Summit – Ke Jie vs. AlphaGo
by computerex on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @09:22AM
(#14400922)
I don't know about the 25% figure, but the original Alpha GO paper mentioned that their best solution is a hybrid approach between neural nets and MCTS. However, the system can beat the best Go bots out there without doing MCTS and relying solemnly on the policy/value networks, which I think is truly amazing.
That would be amazing but it seems hard to believe. Any references?
I found this (which is also impressive):
1. https://www.tastehit.com/blog/google-deepmind-alphago-how-it...2. https://gogameguru.com/i/2016/03/deepmind-mastering-go.pdf