News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Antarctica’s potential collapse could damage coastal citi... by nonbel on Monday May 22, 2017 @02:45PM (#14395964)
Hmm, I'm having trouble figuring out your argument here. I see three premises:

Premise A: Pascal's wager is based on sound reasoning.

Premise B: People who live by pascals wager "live a good life", etc.

Premise C: "Living a good life" is a desirable thing.

Somehow you are arguing that if I reject premise A I must also reject premise C (if I were to act rationally), but I don't follow it.

There are no comments on this comment yet.